Shaadi.com in Trouble: Hyderabad Police File Cyber Fraud Case Against Anupam Mittal’s Platform

Shaadi.com in Trouble: Hyderabad Police File Cyber Fraud Case Against Anupam Mittal’s Platform



Shaadi.com

The Hyderabad Cybercrime Police have filed a case against Shaadi.com after a woman was defrauded of ₹11 lakh through a fake profile on the platform. The incident has sparked concerns over the site’s lax verification processes and raised questions about digital intermediary accountability.

A lady doctor was defrauded of Rs 11 lakh by a phoney profile on Shaadi.com, prompting Hyderabad’s Cybercrime Police to open a formal probe into the website. According to reports, J Vamshi Krishna, the accused, utilised a premium account to fabricate a phoney persona to entice the victim with promises of marriage.

Without conducting any background checks or verification, Krishna took advantage of the platform’s services to directly access the victim. He persuaded the woman to send money by claiming financial hardship, and then he threatened her with private information. Officials characterised this as an instance of money abuse combined with strategic emotional blackmail.

Shaadi.com Under Fire for Careless Verification and Profit Motive

Krishna had committed similar crimes in at least 20 other cases in several states, according to investigations. Shaadi.com allegedly failed to authenticate papers or verify identification, allowing fraudsters to take advantage of unchecked vulnerabilities, even though it marketed its premium profiles as “verified.”

The platform’s revenue-first strategy, which put subscriptions ahead of consumer safety, was condemned by sources in the cybercrime section. Concerns regarding intermediary accountability were raised when the suspect’s phoney profile was accepted and permitted to interact directly with users without the need for required safety procedures like ID verification.

Policy Implications and Legal Repercussions for Digital Platforms

Shaadi.com has been booked by the police under the Information Technology Act and pertinent Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) sections. The case is being looked into as a precedent for digital intermediary accountability under India’s developing cyber laws, in addition to being probed as a stand-alone fraud.

The controversy surrounding India’s digital economy and the absence of regulations governing dating and marriage platforms has been reignited by this high-profile reservation. Cybersecurity experts contend that platforms should be held responsible for failures resulting from their lack of due diligence if they offer “verified” services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *